Area Code 01619

01619 Area Code And Number Information

I am satisfied that the Appellant would not be able to lead anything like a ‘normal’ life if she tried to live in Egypt alone. Internal relocation would, in all the circumstances, be harsh unduly. The Appellant has given her account on numerous occasions. The Respondent has sought to highlight a number of discrepancies that have emerged in that evidence over the three years that the Appellant has been repeatedly setting out her case.

Manufacturer
FIRST CHOICE
Link
Ranking
-
Features
Price
FIRST CHOICE
Manufacturer
Link
Ranking
-
Features
Price
FIRST CHOICE
Manufacturer
Code Blue
Code Blue Unisex's OA1036 hunting-scents, 1-Ounce
Ranking
-
Features
  • Our Drag System is a hard-working dispenser that wont quit
  • Rugged construction and high absorbency makes creating your scent trail easy
  • Use in combination with great Code Blue attractants and scents
Price

Area Code 01619



Bestseller No. 1
Code Blue Unisex's OA1036 hunting-scents, 1-Ounce
  • Our Drag System is a hard-working dispenser that wont quit
  • Rugged construction and high absorbency makes creating your scent trail easy
  • Use in combination with great Code Blue attractants and scents

Close reading of the record show that the Appellant prevaricated about the degree to which she claimed to have been assaulted, and it would appear that it was this vacillation which resulted in the event being recorded as “no crime”. On the contrary, it would make matters worse. Leicester police found there to be “significant” differences in the information the Appellant gave to them, and that which she had given to the Metropolitan Police. I am not satisfied that the differences identified as “significant” by Leicester Police were in truth discrepancies at all. Having had regard to the overall evidence before me, I do not consider there to be any difference at all, a shift in emphasis simply.

Providers Of This Area Code Are:

In making my findings I have given careful consideration to those matters, and to the points made by Mr Wilding in his submissions. Having done so, I am satisfied that although there are some inconsistencies, the account has remained consistent at its core. I am satisfied that such discrepancies that have been identified arise through innocent mistake, a failing of memory or the perspective of the author simply. The substantive interview lasted approximately seven hours and I pay due regard to the Appellant’s submission that over the course of such a long interview she became tired and confused. I have also had regard to the medical /support service evidence that is before me.

Area Code 01619

It is apparent that the Appellant has been struggling with anxiety and depression for some time, and I bear in mind that this can have an effect on someone’s ability to accurately report events. estimated 70 per cent of perpetrators go unpunished. Have invoked death sentences against women for honour related crimes Jirgas. The police have been reported to be ‘complicit’ with perpetrators of honour crimes to avoid filing cases or destroy evidence. There is limited support for women fearing honour crimes and security breaches have been reported in shelters and courts, resulting in the deaths of women. The Appellant’s most recent bundle contains two further letters handwritten in Arabic which are said to have come from her mother. In one her mother warns her that her father has registered a complaint against her with the Egyptian Ministry of the Exterior and asked for their assistance in finding her.

Known Telephone Exchanges Within The Oswestry 01691 Dialling Code

I have given careful consideration to the former suggestion. If the Appellant has managed to ‘talk him round’ on all these previous occasions, the risk is not as great as she portrays it to be perhaps. I have attached some weight to these points.

In view of my findings at the ‘error of law’ stage Mr Wilding did not press this point. He acknowledged that people can have different pressures upon them and that in some cases a father’s desire to have his daughter educated, and the social status that brings, would outweigh his impulse to control her. Mr Wilding rather focused on the plausibility of the alleged events after the Appellant initially came to the UK in 2011.

He has also provided documentary evidence which confirms that he was indeed a student in Cairo at the given time. For those reasons I am minded to attach a significant amount of weight to his evidence. Overall I find that the corroborative evidence produced lends weight to the Appellant’s claim. Having had regard to all of those factors I am satisfied that many of the problems identified in the claim are in truth not discrepancies at all.

  • Having had regard to the national country background evidence, the statement of Mr T, the consistent evidence of the Appellant and to some extent the letters from her mother, I am satisfied that this threat is real.
  • I find as fact that the Appellant has a currently well-founded fear of persecution in Cairo for reasons of her membership of a particular social group.
  • I am satisfied that a young woman trying to live away from her family would very quickly be at risk of discovery, because of the novelty that she would represent simply.
  • The Appellant believes without hesitation that her father shall kill her in order to restore his family name.

Again, there is an obvious criticism that these letters are produced and even if they are from her mother easily, are self-serving. Much was made at the First-tier of the known fact that the envelopes have a return address on them, thereby exposing the Appellant’s mother to risk if for whatever reason they were returned to her undelivered. That is a matter I have borne in mind. Again, in themselves the letters do not attract a great deal of weight. The third tranche of evidence is in my view of a different quality. That is the evidence of Mr T, the Pakistani student who stayed with the family in Egypt.

Area Code

Secondly, it means that the specific adverse finding on whether her father would have permitted her not to wear hijab has been made in isolation from her evidence on that matter. The Appellant was photographed for her passport with her head uncovered. The Tribunal placed significant weight on that matter, finding it to be “totally at odds” with her claim to a strict upbringing, and found that this “seriously damages the appellant’s claim” . In fact, the Appellant’s evidence had been that her father had violently assaulted her when he had found out about the photograph, pulling out so much of her hair that she today wears a wig.

Similar Posts